Grant County’s Natural Resources Advisory Committee penned a letter to the U.S. Forest Service Northwest Region before the 30-day comment period ended to revise a provision that limits harvesting trees larger than 21 inches in diameter.

The 25-year-old rule dubbed the “Eastside Screens” prevents the logging of trees that exceed 21 inches in diameter at breast height in six national forests in Eastern Oregon and Washington, including the Malheur National Forest. It was adopted as a temporary set of rules to protect streams, rivers, and other wildlife habitats.

The committee talked about what they believe the economic impact would be on Grant County if the rule was rolled back.

“From my point of view, I feel it would go a long way towards turning these timber sales into a positive for the, I would say, the public versus a deficit,” Tim Rude said.

He said a stable pine tree over 21 inches would be worth a lot more money than a seven-inch pine tree or a 10-inch pine tree.

Bill Skinner, who spent upwards of four decades with the Forest Service, said nine out of 10 trees are dead or diseased anyway.

Skinner said most dead trees are ponderosa pine because the rule’s whole idea was to preserve the ponderosa pine stands.

Rude said there are stressed trees, dead trees and dying trees, and he said most people with “any common sense” can see that there are some healthy trees that should not be logged.

“It’s common sense,” Rude said. “But we went a long ways away from common sense.”

Billie Jo George said the Forest Service cannot do proper forest restoration now because the ponderosa pines now include white fir trees.

“The environmentalists are all zeroed in on the pine. When you say ‘21-inch,’ all they think is big ponderosa pine,” she said. “And there’s a lot more to it than that.”

Dan Becker said in the Oct. 8 meeting that after reading over the Forest Service’s document, where it talks about collaboration, monitoring and adaptive management, that trust has been an issue.

“This is the exact reason why we (NRAC) exist,” he said. “Because they haven’t been very forthcoming about their projects with the county and telling us what they’re doing and why.”

Becker said, during the Crawford project, the Forest Service wrote into the documents they were going to monitor.

“And yet I doubt they ever monitored how much smoke they created,” Becker said. “That affected the town of Austin.”

Becker said, if the Forest Service says they are going to monitor, they need to do it.

George said they did not care either.

Becker said he wants the Forest Service to demonstrate the things they have put into their environmental documents.



Steven Mitchell is a reporter for the Blue Mountain Eagle. Contact him at or 541-575-0710.

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.